Prompt: Listen, Mistress… tonight you’re going to crawl, call me ‘Daddy’ and thank me for the privilege, and smile while you do it.
The Rising Threat of AI-Generated Pseudo-Sexual Content
As a sex worker and feminist I’ve always believed in women’s agency over their bodies and sexuality. Yet recently, Instagram has left me deeply unsettled. (And don’t get me started on the cesspit X’s censorship.) The platform is now flooded with short AI-generated clips (usually just 3–5 seconds long) featuring hyper-realistic “women” in pseudo-sexual, kink related or sexually suggestive acts. Many viewers don’t even realise these are fake. This trend isn’t just creepy – it’s strongly misogynistic and risks undoing decades of feminist progress.
I’ve spent years trying to build a presence on Instagram, posting nothing explicit — no nudity, no adult content, each time my account was deleted. (I’ve finally managed to keep one open, but only by using a normal name and sticking to safe, domestic, white-background photos.) I get it — Instagram positions itself as a mainstream, family-friendly platform for creativity and connection. So why is my feed flooded with AI-generated women simulating blowjobs and pseudo sex acts in every other post?
It feels like Instagram’s moderation has shifted to AI systems that are either overly aggressive toward real creators and obivious toward synthetic content that evades the algorithms. This is a huge problem for sex workers. Platforms like Instagram and X (Twitter) are essential for building visibility and connecting with clients. When legitimate creators are suppressed while fake content thrives, it creates an uneven and exploitative environment.
AI “Women” from the Male Lens
Scrolling Instagram today, it’s overwhelming. Almost every other post shows AI-generated deep fake women in disturbingly realistic clips: grinding/suggestive movements, simulating blowjobs or sex, public humiliation, implied watersports, upskirting or other demeaning and non-consensual acts — all careful just to ‘imply’ the action while fully dressed to dodge the content filters.
As someone in the sex industry, I have zero issue with consensual adult acts – including BDSM, submission, humiliation, or rough play – when women choose them freely. The difference with AI content is stark: there is no woman. These images are created entirely through the male gaze, with no filter, no boundaries, and no agency. Created for fast clicks. Men can make the AI ‘women’ do literally anything. This takes us backwards.
In the 1950s–80s porn was often deeply misogynistic, crude and explotative because it was made almost exclusively by and for men. When women entered the industry controlling their own content, we gained control. Performers could say “no” to certain acts, demand better conditions, and shape content that better reflected female desire and boundaries. The result was more balanced, positive and authentic erotic imagery – even when it remained explicit or submissive. AI threatens to erase that progress. It hands total control back to the male lens, removing women’s voices entirely!
Real-World Harms
Many of these clips depict scenarios that would be illegal or platform-banned if real: non-consensual acts, public BDSM, or scenarios involving what appear to be ‘very young’ looking women. Yet they slip through because they’re synthetic and cleverly disguised. It even made to look like stolen real footage but is generated. Worse, these clips often link to scam sites promising “real” interactions. Click through and you’re unlikely to reach an actual woman – or even a real person! Another concern is whether these AI faces and bodies are created from stolen images of real women. While I don’t have definitive proof, the realism suggests massive datasets scraped from the internet, I’m sure without consent. That raises serious ethical and legal questions about digital likeness rights and exploitation. Would you like your ‘image’ used to perform acts that are demeaning or illegal?
AI Is Just a Tool – But Tools Have Consequences
AI itself isn’t evil. Like any powerful technology, it brings both incredible positives and serious risks. In creative fields, medicine and education it can do wonders. In sexual content, however, it currently amplifies the worst impulses: removing consent, agency, and accountability. We need better platform responsibility. Instagram must improve detection of AI-generated sexual content, especially when it mimics non-consensual, misogynist or underage-adjacent scenarios. Creators deserve clearer rules, and users need transparency about synthetic media.
Exploitation 2.0
Reigning In Flames: Lady Phoenix
Who Was the World’s First Dominatrix? Pt2
All the following quotes are further extracts from the ‘Flagellation’ entry in Ashbee’s Index of Forbidden Books, which I think place Miss Berkley as most certainly, the First Lady of professional domination.
After her death in 1836, her memoirs, which had long been announced for publication, were held back by the executor of her will, Dr. Vance. And, sadly like so much erotica and sexual material from the period was destroyed. It was rumoured to contain compromising letters from certain members of the establishment, “from the highest aristocracy, both male and female, in the land.” Their contents were so outrageous that it was claimed they could have “threatened the very fabric of society.”
art collection at her prestigious Decadence event, held at the magnificent Maxwell Manor, last year. 
Good BDSM play involves intense physical, sexual, psychological and emotional exchanges, sometimes as a consequence of this the submissive goes into an altered state. This is often referred to as ‘Subspace’. It is a difficult experience to define as it both manifests and is experienced differently by different subs.
